Skip to content

Read this page in Italian

Emotions, NLP, Coaching

The Emotion Abacus

Giovanni Ceroni's emotion abacus: Plutchik's wheel, Ekman's model and Feldman Barrett's theory, with practical exercises for recognizing emotions.

In 30 seconds. This page presents a perspective developed through study, experience and practice on the models of Plutchik, Ekman and Feldman Barrett as practical tools for recognising and distinguishing your own emotions. The topic is developed in Volume I of The Invisible Blade series.

Psychological wellbeing starts with recognizing and understanding your own emotions. NLP provides the tools to explore your emotional world and develop an emotional intelligence that lets you live a fuller life.

What Is the Emotion Abacus?

The emotion abacus is a structured catalog of human emotions, useful for precisely investigating a client's mood, distinguishing and describing it, in order to guide them effectively during a session.

The Categories of the Emotion Abacus

Emotions are classified into different categories:

Why the Emotion Abacus Matters in Coaching

Having a detailed catalog of emotions available matters because it lets you move past a generic perception of mood (“I feel bad,” “I'm stressed”) toward a precise description, which is the first step for effective emotional regulation. The richer the emotional vocabulary, the more exactly you can recognize what you're feeling, instead of perceiving every discomfort as one undifferentiated mass.

How to Use the Emotion Abacus

Several researchers have proposed complementary models for understanding emotions. Robert Plutchik developed the “wheel of emotions,” based on eight primary emotions (joy, sadness, anger, fear, disgust, surprise, anticipation and trust) considered universal and innate, present in every culture. Combining them generates secondary emotions: for example, joy and trust give rise to love, while anger and fear can lead to hostility. Each emotion, according to Plutchik, has an opposite (joy-sadness, anger-fear) and can vary in intensity.

Paul Ekman devoted his career to studying facial expressions, concluding that some basic emotions are universal and recognizable across cultures, and developed a coding system (Facial Action Coding System) to identify the facial muscle movements associated with each emotion. Lisa Feldman Barrett instead proposes a different view: emotions wouldn't be discrete, predefined categories, but mental constructions the brain generates in real time, based on sensory information and past experience.

To train yourself concretely to identify and understand your own emotions, three exercises are useful. The emotions journal: spend a few minutes a day noting the emotions felt, describing them in detail, identifying the events or thoughts that triggered them, and placing them on Plutchik's wheel to understand their intensity and composition. The visualization exercise: pick an emotion to explore, imagine being fully immersed in it (seeing what you'd see, hearing the sounds, feeling the bodily sensations) and observe which thoughts accompany it. The emotion scale: rate the intensity of each emotion felt on a scale from 1 to 10, repeating the exercise regularly to track how it changes.

Common mistakes

A common mistake is trying to eliminate or suppress emotions labeled “negative,” instead of recognizing and accepting them without judgment as part of the human experience. A second mistake is sticking to a single theory of emotions, when in reality the different models (Plutchik, Ekman, Barrett) offer complementary perspectives, each useful in different contexts. A third mistake is skipping the practical training phase (journal, visualization, emotion scale), thinking that theoretical knowledge of the catalog alone is enough to improve emotional awareness.

Practical example

A person who, at the end of the day, notes in their emotions journal “today I felt irritated during a meeting” can dig deeper by placing that feeling on Plutchik's wheel: is it pure anger, or a combination with other primary emotions, like surprise at something unexpected? This level of detail lets you, over time, recognize recurring patterns in the situations that trigger certain emotions.

A second case shows the same principle from another angle. At the end of a meeting, someone says: “I'm angry.” That's already more precise than “I feel bad,” but it might not be the most useful description yet. “Angry, in exactly what way?” Going back over what happened, it might turn out there wasn't just anger: their proposal was ignored, a decision was made without involving them, and what was first called “anger” starts looking more and more like disappointment and a sense of exclusion.

They haven't eliminated the emotion, or reframed it as something positive. They've done something that comes first: they've increased the resolution at which they're observing it. And once the precision of the description changes, the questions that become possible can change too.

Applications

The emotion abacus applies directly to coaching, as a tool for guiding a client to recognize and precisely describe their own mood; to personal growth, as a foundation for developing emotional intelligence; and to preparing anchoring techniques, which require clearly identifying the emotional state to be recalled or changed.

Frequently asked questions

What are the six universal primary emotions? Joy, sadness, anger, fear, disgust and surprise: considered universal, with a strong physiological component recognizable across cultures.

What is Plutchik's wheel of emotions? It's a model that graphically represents eight primary emotions (the six above plus anticipation and trust) and their combinations, which generate increasingly complex secondary emotions the further you move from the center of the wheel.

How does Lisa Feldman Barrett's theory differ from the others? Barrett argues that emotions aren't fixed, predefined categories in the brain, but mental constructions generated in real time from bodily sensations and past experience, in contrast with Ekman's idea of “universal” emotions.

How do you keep an effective emotions journal? By noting the emotions felt daily, describing them in detail along with the events or thoughts that triggered them, and placing them on Plutchik's wheel to understand their intensity and composition.

What's the point of knowing a broad catalog of emotions? It lets you replace generic descriptions of your state (“I feel bad”) with precise ones. This is the first step toward effective emotional regulation, a principle explored further in the concept of emotional granularity.

Related concepts

Emotions in NLP, Emotional Granularity, Russell's Circumplex: the Map of Emotions, What Is an Internal State.

Go deeper

The emotion abacus, with the models of Plutchik, Ekman and Feldman Barrett and their practical exercises, is presented in Volume I of “The Invisible Blade”, as the foundation for the following work on emotional granularity.

Related articles

Giovanni Ceroni
Ing. Giovanni Ceroni

Strategic coach and mental coach. Author of The Invisible Blade – Strategic NLP series and creator of The Invisible Blade Method™.

Further reading to go deeper

If this topic interests you, these readings can help you go beyond the summary offered on this page.

Emotions and NLP

Circumplex Model of Affect

James A. Russell

Useful for exploring the dimensional model of emotion referenced on this page.
Frogs into Princes

Richard Bandler, John Grinder

A historical reference for anyone wanting to approach the origins of Neuro-Linguistic Programming.

Open the full “Further Reading” section

Sources
  • Barrett, L. F. (2017). How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions Revealed. New York: Times Books.
  • LeDoux, J. (1996). The Emotional Brain. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Plutchik, R. (1980). Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary Synthesis. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A Circumplex Model of Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.

Sources cited in the chapter bibliography of The Invisible Blade series.

CONTINUE FROM HERE

The next step

Next article

Communicating Is Not Informing

Communicating Is Not Informing

Related hub

Emotions

Open Hub

Loading…

FAQ

The most searched questions about NLP, coaching and communication.

Go to FAQ