Leggi questa pagina in italiano

Coaching, NLP, Decisions

The Change Process Model

How a change intervention is structured in Giovanni Ceroni's NLP: from Rapport to future pacing, through current state and desired state.

In 30 seconds. This page presents a perspective built through study, experience and practice, connecting the topic to Giovanni Ceroni's books and to the La Lama Invisibile / The Invisible Blade series.

It's not a matter of perfection, but of reaching the goal, choosing the most useful tools and adjusting them based on the feedback the person gives back.

What it is

The change process model is the general structure within which, in NLP, individual intervention techniques get placed. Understanding an experience isn't enough: what's learned has to translate into an intervention capable of generating real, verifiable change. Specific techniques — whichever choice best suits the moment — are never applied in isolation, but within a sequence of stages that guarantees their effectiveness.

Why it matters

This model matters because a technique applied outside a coherent structure loses much of its effectiveness. It's not the technique itself that generates change, but the process containing it: building the relationship, clarity on the goal, checking the starting point, testing the result, and consolidating it over time. Skipping one of these steps undermines the work, even when the chosen technique is correct.

How it works

The process unfolds in a sequence of conceptual stages. It starts with Rapport, a necessary condition before any intervention. Then the desired state gets defined, the client's goal, explored through questions aimed at clarifying what the person really wants to achieve. A pattern interrupt separates mental states, bringing the person back to the here and now before proceeding, preventing different states from blending together. The current state is then explored: where the person really stands relative to the goal, and how that situation came about. After a further pattern interrupt, the most suitable technique is chosen to guide the person from the current state to the desired one, based on what's emerged up to that point. A testing stage follows, to verify the change genuinely happened — if the test doesn't confirm the result, the technique is repeated or another one is chosen. Finally, future pacing projects the change into the future, imagining a situation similar to the starting one while the new internal setup is already in place: this step serves to consolidate and make the achieved change lasting.

A central principle of this model is its operational flexibility: the techniques learned can be chained, combined and assembled in different ways depending on the person in front of you. There's no fixed, universal sequence of techniques to apply mechanically: it's the client's continuous feedback — their physiology, their words, their congruence — that indicates which tool to use at that specific moment. If a chosen technique isn't working, it's normal and correct to stop it and change approach, without this compromising the overall process: the person experiences the journey as continuous and natural, regardless of the internal course corrections made by whoever is leading the session.

Common mistakes

A common mistake is applying a technique in isolation, without first clearly defining the desired and current states, losing sight of the intervention's direction. A second mistake is skipping the testing stage, assuming the change has happened without concretely verifying it. A third mistake is omitting future pacing, leaving the achieved change isolated in the moment of the session, without projecting and consolidating it in real future scenarios.

Practical example

A person reports intense discomfort every time they have to face a certain recurring situation. Before choosing a specific technique, whoever is guiding the process checks Rapport, clarifies with a well-formed goal what the desired state should be in place of the discomfort, explores what the current state looks like, and only then selects the most suitable tool to guide the change. After the intervention, they check with a test whether the discomfort, mentally recalled, comes back with the same intensity as before or has genuinely decreased. Only once the result is confirmed do they project the person into a similar future situation, to consolidate the change over time.

Applications

This model applies to any change-oriented coaching intervention: managing unhelpful emotions, dropping limiting behaviors, overcoming limiting beliefs, and generally any process aimed at guiding a person from a current state to a desired one in a structured, verifiable way.

Frequently asked questions

Why should an NLP technique never be applied in isolation? Because its effectiveness depends on the context it's placed in: without solid Rapport, a clear goal and a final check, even the most correct technique risks not producing a real or lasting change.

What are the main stages of the change process model? Rapport, defining the desired state, checking the current state, choosing and applying the technique, testing the result, and finally future pacing to consolidate the change over time.

What's the purpose of future pacing within this model? It projects the achieved change into a future situation similar to the starting one, verifying and consolidating that the new internal setup holds even outside the protected context of the session.

Is it necessary to always follow the same sequence of techniques? No. Techniques can be combined and chained differently depending on the person and situation: it's the client's continuous feedback that indicates which tool is most useful at that moment.

What should you do if a chosen technique isn't producing the expected result? Interrupt it with a pattern interrupt and change approach, without fear of changing course: with experience, this course correction becomes increasingly quick and natural.

Related concepts

What Is an Anchor and How Anchoring Works, What Are Submodalities, The Agreement Frame, What Is an Internal State.

Go deeper

The change process model is presented in the chapter of the same name in Volume II of "The Invisible Blade", as the reference structure for all the intervention techniques that follow.

Go deeper in the books

If this topic is useful to you, you can explore it further in the "The Invisible Blade" series, where concepts are connected to examples, models and practical applications.

Related articles

Giovanni Ceroni
Giovanni Ceroni

Mental Coach and author of the La Lama Invisibile / The Invisible Blade series.